Interactive practice
Diagnose the rubric flaw
Each scenario is a short excerpt from a realistic dissertation manuscript. For each one, name which chapter of the STU Dissertation Sections Rubric is being missed — then pick the revision that actually fixes it. Feedback explains why the plausible-looking wrong answers fall short.
Scenario 1 of 7 · Quantitative
Chapters 0/0 · Remedies 0/0
A dissertation draft says: Problem — 'It is not known to what extent workload predicts burnout among ICU nurses.' Purpose — 'The purpose of this qualitative phenomenological study is to explore how ICU nurses describe their workday.' Primary RQ — 'Is there a relationship between workload and burnout among ICU nurses?'
Step 1 — Which chapter's rubric criteria are being missed?
Want to study a single chapter in depth? Each chapter module has its own reading, an AI coach, a rating exercise, and a knowledge check — open them from the top navigation.